So I can no longer take part in their chocolaty goodness, cos i don't eat meat.
However this is not a vegetarian ranting blog oh no, this is a blog about fun!
The essence of fun, is as you know enjoyment. Everyone has had fun I'm sure (and if you haven't then you're probably called Adolf (but this raises questions about did Hitler have fun killing Jews??!!??O_o)) So hopefully people understand this simple equation...
Now from this we can see that fun is a direct result of enjoyment over a period of time (there were a range of pie charts graphs and tables here but they were lost in the great excel cull of may 16Th 2007)
We now have to ask, seeing as we have the mathematical basis for fun, can fun be applied in any other format...for example in length or size.
Can fun be denoted in length is my main argument here because i feel, quite strongly, that whoever decided that two inch mars bars were fun, seriously needs to re-evaluate their measurement of enjoyment. I mean how is something less than half the size of a regular size Mars Bar fun?? Does the "Fun" in a chocolate bar begin at a lower length than previously thought?
However during my studies I did find out that kinglyness starts after the mythical end of a mars bar (Mythical now because the said king size does not exist due to too many people attempting to overthrow monarchies in too many countries. in 2006 the King size was reduced to the sad excuse the Mars Duo. Two slightly smaller than usual Mars bars, and although reaching over the "Fun length" each they counter act each others fun leading to disappointment and regret)

No comments:
Post a Comment